TRASHWIRE.COM

Home
Fresh Garbage
About Us
Take Out The Trash (Opinions and Editorials)
Reviews
The Landfill
The Dustbin of History
The Coffin of Evil
TRASHWIRE Entertainment
Interview Page
Junk Mail
Contact Us
Links
Crimes Against Language

Presidential stupidity

Note this stunning Bush statement:

"The U.N. Security Council must act in a way to hold this regime to account and must not be fooled -- must be relevant to keep the peace."

What does this mean? How is "relevant to keep the peace" connected to the previous part of this so-called sentence? Notice the bizarre punctuation --. Since this is a transcript of a speech I can only assume that the poor transcriber had no clue what to make of this and made up the -- on the spot to indicate "unrelated partial phrase to follow." What is the subject of "relevant"? We have two nouns to choose from : UN Security Council and This Regime. So the possible second sentences are:.

"The UN Security Council must be relevant to keep the peace."
"This regime must be relevant to keep the peace."

Utter nonsense, both of them. Can a President be impeaced for crimes against
Language?


Check out more examples of amazing incompetence on the "Take Out The Trash" page.

(c) 2000-2005 Alexis Gentry